The Channel 4 programme Location, Location, Location did it's annual Best and Worst list last week and the results are below. I've never lived in any of them (though close to a few) and have only ever been to about five of them. I probably couldn't afford to live in any of the best places anyway! So if you're looking to move house or visit Britain, it might be worth consulting these lists first!
Best places to live:
- Edinburgh
- Winchester
- Epsom & Ewell
- Waverley
- Mole Valley
- Surrey Heath
- South Cambridgeshire
- Chelmsford
- Horsham
- Cambridge
- East Dunbartonshire
- Guildford
- St Albans
- Rushcliffe
- Bath & North East Somerset
- Mid Sussex
- Suffolk Coastal
- South Northamptonshire
- Reigate and Banstead
- Wokingham
Worst places to live:
- Middlesborough
- Kingston Upon Hull
- Newham
- Nottingham
- Merthyr Tydfil
- North East Lincolnshire – Grimsby
- Islington
- Blaenau Gwent
- Mansfield
- Knowsley
- Blackpool
- Hackney
- Stoke on Trent
- Brking & Dagenham
- Doncaster
- Cannock Chase
- Manchester
- Haringey
- Burnley
- Hartlepool
4 comments:
Still say Peterborough should be on the second list
But you're biased on account of literally being stabbed in the back there.
Since I found you on a grammar site, I'm wondering if the first sentence should contain its rather than it's. But I'm AmE, so maybe it ain't the same.
Roger, I consider myself chastised, I fell it to the trap of thinking as "its" is possesive it needs an apostrophy but I was wrong (and have corrected it).
Now this blog is not a site about grammar so as long as you understood the meaning I hope you don't mind too much!
Post a Comment